derrida and husserl : suspension or obedience
نویسندگان
چکیده
husserl’s thoughts and phenomenological method is one of conceptual resources of derrida and deconstruction the overt and covert. in accordance with it’s normal method in facing with philosophers and their works , der-rida acts both positive and negative. he was strong critic of husserl and yet he is clearly deeply affected . derrida’s critique of husserl challenging the claim that showed suspend in the realm of epistemology presuppositions .the transcendental »i« is as the subject of such act . derrida claims that the transcendental »i «remains out of suspension process in the phenom-enology. in addition , derrida believes that husserl is also one of the found-ers of the metaphysics of presence in twentieth century. husserl’s metaphys-ics of presence emerged more in discussion of signs . regardless of critical and negative encounter with husserl . derrida has deep away of his effects . derrida in the development of deconstruction both structurally and material is benefited of phenomenology. deconstruction in general came out phenome-nology and structuralism, and differance specifically as the central concept of deconstruction, the result of the combination of the core concepts of difference and suspension, reduction and epoché. in summery this paper consists of two part . first section , derrida’s critique of husserl is sought and the second section , the impact of the phenomenology and husserl on deconstruction and derrida will be examined .
منابع مشابه
Stratification and supernatural punishment: cooperation or obedience?
Schloss and Murray (S&M) have provided an insightful and important contribution to our understanding of the role of supernatural punishment in the evolution of religious systems. Future researchers will need to pay particular attention to their refinements of the cooperation enhancement (CE) and punishment avoidance (PA) approaches. While S&M acknowledge ‘‘considerable empirical support that . ...
متن کاملProcrastination and Obedience
Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of JSTOR's Terms and Conditions of Use, available at http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp. JSTOR's Terms and Conditions of Use provides, in part, that unless you have obtained prior permission, you may not download an entire issue of a journal or multiple copies of articles, and you may use content in the JSTOR archive o...
متن کاملObedience lite.
Jerry M. Burger's partial replication of Stanley Milgram's (1963, 1965, 1974) classic experiments on obedience to authority is considered from the viewpoint of a contributor and witness to the original obedience experiments. Although Burger's replication succeeded in terms of gaining the approval of his local institutional review board, it did so by removing a large portion of the stressful cir...
متن کاملHusserl and Haugeland on Constitution
Both Husserl and Haugeland develop an account of constitution to address the question of how our mental episodes can be about physical objects and thus, through the intentional relation, bridge the gap between the mental and the physical. The respective theories of the two philosophers of very different background show not only how mental episodes can have empirical content, but also how this c...
متن کاملBehavioral Study of Obedience.
This article describes a procedure for the study of destructive obedience in the laboratory. It coruists of ordering a naive S to administer increasingly more w e r e punishment to a victim in the context of a learning experiment. Punishment is .administered by means of a shock generator with 30 graded switches ranging from Slight Shock to Danger: Severe Shock. The victim is a confederate of th...
متن کاملمنابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
عنوان ژورنال:
فلسفهجلد ۴۳، شماره ۲، صفحات ۳۹-۵۶
کلمات کلیدی
میزبانی شده توسط پلتفرم ابری doprax.com
copyright © 2015-2023